Harley Flanagan, the founder and frontman of the legendary hardcore punk band Cro-Mags, recently voiced his frustration regarding perceived snubs from major metal acts like Metallica and Pantera. Flanagan claims that despite his band’s significant influence and history, they haven’t received invitations to tour with these prominent groups.
Flanagan’s statements have sparked a discussion within the music community about the role of legacy, influence, and the often-unpredictable dynamics of tour lineups. While some fans sympathize with his perspective, others argue that tour decisions are complex and driven by various factors beyond simply acknowledging a band’s impact.
Harley Flanagan’s Claims and Context
The Essence of Flanagan’s Grievance
Flanagan’s core complaint revolves around what he sees as a lack of recognition for Cro-Mags’ contribution to the hardcore and metal scenes. He believes that given Cro-Mags’ pioneering status and influence on bands like Metallica and Pantera, they should have been considered for tour support slots.
He suggests that touring with such high-profile acts would not only provide Cro-Mags with a significant platform but also acknowledge their historical importance. Flanagan’s frustration seems rooted in a sense of being overlooked despite his band’s lasting impact.
Cro-Mags’ Influence and Legacy
Cro-Mags emerged in the early 1980s, blending hardcore punk with elements of metal and creating a sound that would become hugely influential. Their debut album, “The Age of Quarrel,” is considered a landmark release in the crossover genre, inspiring countless bands that followed. The band’s fusion of aggression, spirituality (through Hare Krishna beliefs), and street-level realism resonated with a wide audience.
The band’s impact extends beyond just their music. Cro-Mags’ DIY ethic and independent spirit helped shape the broader hardcore scene. They proved that bands could create powerful, impactful music outside of the mainstream music industry. Their influence can be heard in bands across various subgenres, from metalcore to thrash metal.
Metallica and Pantera: A Brief Overview
Metallica, formed in 1981, is one of the “big four” of thrash metal and has achieved unparalleled commercial success. Their albums have sold millions worldwide, and they continue to be a major force in the metal world. Metallica’s influence is undeniable, having inspired generations of musicians and fans.
Pantera, formed in 1981 and achieving prominence in the 1990s, is a metal band known for its groove-laden, aggressive sound. Their album “Vulgar Display of Power” is considered a classic. Pantera’s influence on modern metal is substantial, with many bands citing them as a key inspiration. The band recently reformed with Zakk Wylde and Charlie Benante filling the roles of the late Dimebag Darrell and Vinnie Paul, respectively.
Reactions and Implications
Industry Perspectives
The music industry is a complex ecosystem where relationships, business considerations, and current trends often dictate tour lineups. While a band’s historical influence is undoubtedly a factor, it’s rarely the sole determinant. Promoters and band managers must consider ticket sales, venue size, and overall profitability.
Additionally, personal relationships and past collaborations can play a significant role. Bands may choose to tour with artists they have a pre-existing connection with or who share a similar fanbase. These decisions are often strategic and based on maximizing the tour’s success.
Fan Reactions
Fan reactions to Flanagan’s comments have been mixed. Some fans empathize with his frustration, arguing that Cro-Mags deserve greater recognition and exposure. They believe that touring with Metallica or Pantera would be a fitting tribute to the band’s legacy.
Other fans are more pragmatic, pointing out that tour decisions are ultimately business decisions. They argue that Metallica and Pantera have the right to choose whoever they believe will best complement their show and attract the largest audience. Some fans also question whether Cro-Mags’ current lineup and sound align with the expectations of Metallica or Pantera’s fanbase.
The Broader Discussion on Legacy and Recognition
Flanagan’s comments have sparked a broader discussion about the importance of recognizing and honoring the pioneers of various musical genres. Many argue that it’s crucial to acknowledge the contributions of influential bands like Cro-Mags, who paved the way for subsequent generations of artists. However, there is no single answer on how this recognition should manifest.
Some believe that major acts have a responsibility to support and promote lesser-known but influential bands. Others argue that each band is responsible for managing its own career and that there is no obligation to provide a platform for others. The debate highlights the ongoing tension between artistic merit, commercial success, and the ever-evolving dynamics of the music industry.
Behind-the-Scenes of Tour Lineups
The Business Side of Touring
Touring is a major source of revenue for many bands, and the decisions surrounding tour lineups are often driven by financial considerations. Promoters and band managers carefully analyze potential ticket sales, venue capacities, and production costs to determine the most profitable combination of artists. The goal is to maximize revenue while minimizing risk.
Support acts are typically chosen based on their ability to attract additional ticket buyers. Bands with a similar fanbase or a strong regional following may be selected to help boost attendance in specific markets. In some cases, support acts may even pay to be included on a tour, a practice known as “pay-to-play.” This can be a controversial issue, as it raises questions about fairness and access to opportunities.
The Role of Personal Relationships
Personal relationships and friendships can also play a significant role in tour lineup decisions. Bands may choose to tour with artists they admire or have a close personal connection with. These relationships can lead to collaborations and cross-promotion, benefiting both bands involved. In some cases, bands may even offer support slots to up-and-coming artists they believe in, providing them with valuable exposure.
However, personal relationships can also create challenges. Bands may face pressure to include certain artists on a tour, even if they don’t necessarily align with the overall aesthetic or target audience. Balancing personal relationships with business considerations can be a delicate balancing act.
The Evolving Music Landscape
The music industry has undergone a dramatic transformation in recent years, with the rise of streaming services and the decline of traditional record sales. This has placed even greater emphasis on touring as a primary source of income for many bands. As a result, the competition for tour slots has become increasingly fierce.
Bands are now forced to be more strategic and creative in their approach to touring. They may need to explore alternative revenue streams, such as merchandise sales and VIP packages, to supplement their income. They may also need to be more flexible in their touring schedules, targeting smaller venues and niche markets to reach their fanbase.
Lars Ulrich of Metallica with Pantera onstage. The Cro-Mags Singer Calls Out Metallica, Pantera + More for Not Taking Him on Tour, leading to discussions about legacy and touring opportunities.
Alternative Perspectives and Considerations
The Importance of Self-Promotion and Networking
While Flanagan’s frustration is understandable, it’s also important to recognize the role of self-promotion and networking in securing tour opportunities. Bands must actively market themselves to promoters, managers, and other industry professionals. They need to build relationships and demonstrate their ability to attract an audience.
This can involve attending industry events, showcasing their music at festivals and conferences, and utilizing social media to connect with fans and potential collaborators. Bands that are proactive in promoting themselves are more likely to be considered for tour slots.
The Role of Management and Representation
Having strong management and representation can significantly increase a band’s chances of securing tour opportunities. Experienced managers have established relationships with promoters and booking agents, giving them access to a wider range of potential tours. They can also negotiate better deals and ensure that the band is properly represented.
However, securing effective management can be challenging, especially for smaller bands. Managers typically work on commission, so they are more likely to represent bands that have the potential to generate significant revenue. Bands may need to build a strong track record and demonstrate their potential before attracting the attention of a reputable manager.
The Value of Regional and DIY Touring
While touring with major acts like Metallica or Pantera would undoubtedly provide Cro-Mags with significant exposure, it’s also important to recognize the value of regional and DIY touring. These smaller-scale tours can allow bands to build a loyal fanbase, hone their performance skills, and generate revenue without relying on the support of larger acts.
DIY touring can also be a more sustainable and fulfilling approach for bands that prioritize artistic control and independence. By booking their own shows and managing their own tours, bands can maintain a greater degree of autonomy and connect directly with their fans.
Key Takeaways
- Harley Flanagan of Cro-Mags expressed disappointment over not being invited to tour with Metallica and Pantera.
- Tour lineup decisions are complex, influenced by business considerations, personal relationships, and current trends.
- Cro-Mags’ influence on hardcore and metal is undeniable, but legacy alone doesn’t guarantee tour slots.
- Self-promotion, networking, and strong management play crucial roles in securing touring opportunities.
- Regional and DIY touring offer alternative pathways for bands to build a fanbase and generate revenue.
FAQ
Why does Harley Flanagan feel snubbed?
Flanagan believes that Cro-Mags’ significant influence on bands like Metallica and Pantera warrants consideration for tour support slots. He feels overlooked despite his band’s historical importance.
What factors influence tour lineup decisions?
Tour lineups are determined by a mix of business considerations (ticket sales, venue size), personal relationships, and current musical trends. Historical influence is a factor but rarely the sole determinant.
Is it common for bands to feel entitled to tour with bigger acts?
While frustration over missed opportunities is common, the music industry is highly competitive. There’s no guarantee that influence or legacy will translate into tour invitations.
What can bands do to increase their chances of getting on major tours?
Active self-promotion, strategic networking, securing strong management, and building a solid track record are all crucial steps for bands seeking tour opportunities.
Conclusion
Harley Flanagan’s candid remarks highlight the complexities and often-unpredictable nature of the music industry. While Cro-Mags’ influence is undeniable, securing tour slots with major acts like Metallica and Pantera involves a multifaceted equation beyond just legacy. The discussion underscores the importance of self-promotion, networking, and strategic decision-making for bands navigating the competitive landscape. Perhaps Flanagan’s comments will spark a renewed interest in Cro-Mags’ music and inspire a new generation of fans to discover their influential sound. Consider exploring Cro-Mags’ discography and supporting their future endeavors as they continue to forge their path in the hardcore scene.
Check out related coverage on Loudwire.
